Delores Beyersdorf · Diversified Farm
An eight-acre diversified farm drawing from the Yakima River and a private well, with two units fitted. Reported improvements across soil texture, crop recovery, livestock water clarity and household plumbing, all observational.
Conducted by Video interview with Delores Beyersdorf, a longtime customer of Creative Ag Products. Observational account across roughly two months, with no measurement or control.
- LOCATION
- Benton City, Washington (Yakima Valley)
- PERIOD
- Under two months from installation, as described on camera
- EQUIPMENT
- Four-inch vortex generator on the river-fed irrigation line, plus a second unit on the household well
Read the underlying report
Every figure on this page is traceable to the documents below. Nothing is modelled, estimated, or extrapolated.
CITATIONBeyersdorf, D. (2026). Field Testimonial: Vortex Generator Water Treatment on Farm and Household Water Systems. Benton City, Washington.
What the trial measured
Soil and crop response
THE STANDOUT RESULT- Soil softened and became easier to work within two days of switching to vortex-treated irrigation water.
- Weeds pulled out easily and regrew visibly weaker, described by the grower as weak and wimpy.
- Strawberry leaves went from chronic brown-edge calcium deficiency to healthy glossy green.
- Brown, damaged bean leaves recovered to fresh green growth within days.
- A persistent black scummy buildup on greenhouse soil cleared within 36 to 48 hours.
- Previously compacted tilled soil turned to fine workable granules, ahead of a six-variety potato crop.
Water clarity and household effects
- Livestock troughs that previously turned murky with algae within two hours stayed clear for weeks.
- Three days after the household unit went in, years of internal PVC pipe buildup cleared.
- Persistent laundry dinginess and stiffness resolved after a few washes, without heavy bleach or hydrogen peroxide.
- Faucets, toilets and fixtures required less scrubbing and stopped showing water spots.
- A previously frustrated composting process normalised after installation.
The water problem behind it
- Irrigation water arrives from the Yakima River, draining a largely conventional agricultural region.
- The source has had documented upstream sewage incidents.
- Household and livestock water comes from a separate private well described as previously trusted.
- The grower's framing is that natural inputs and beneficial microbes can only perform as well as the water carrying them.
- Pasture appeared even and manicured within about a week, with less water used for comparable production.
“Within two days of changing the water, the texture of the soil was softer. The weeds that regrew after that seemed very, very weak and wimpy.”
This one is different from the others because the problem was the water, not the irrigation volume. Two very different sources, a compromised river and a well nobody suspected, feeding a farm doing everything else right and still fighting compaction, algae and calcium uptake.
The observations that carry most are the ones with a clear before and after on a short clock. Algae returning within two hours against troughs staying clear for weeks. Greenhouse scum gone in a day and a half. Pipe buildup clearing on day three. Those are the sort of thing a person notices without looking for it.
Nothing here was measured. No water test before or after, no soil assay, no calcium tissue analysis to confirm the strawberry recovery, no yield data. This is the only summary in the set that arrived without its own limitations section, and it reads as promotional throughout.
So it belongs on the site as one farmer's account of two water sources and what changed after, and nothing in it should be quoted as a performance figure. If the farm is willing, a simple before and after water panel on both sources would turn the most interesting parts of this into something checkable.
Trial at a glance
- OPERATION
- Eight-acre diversified farm: fruit, grapes, berries, vegetables, two greenhouses, pasture and livestock
- LOCATION
- Benton City, Washington, Yakima Valley
- WATER SOURCES
- Yakima River for irrigation, private well for house and livestock
- EQUIPMENT
- Four-inch vortex generator on the irrigation line, second unit on the household well
- PERIOD
- Under two months from installation, as described on camera
- PRIOR PRACTICE
- Consistent natural chemical-free inputs, soil testing and beneficial microbes
- MEASUREMENT
- None. Entirely observational, with no water, soil or tissue testing
- CONTROL
- None. Comparison is against the farm's own prior condition
- REFERRED BY
- Longtime customer of Creative Ag Products / Uncle Jimmy's Garden Group
Findings that cut against the headline. We publish them because a grower deciding on a retrofit deserves the whole picture.
- Single farm, observational, with no control area and no measurement of any kind. Every outcome is the grower's own visual assessment.
- No water quality testing was carried out before or after installation on either source, so the contamination the account attributes the problems to is described rather than characterized.
- The strawberry calcium recovery is a visual leaf assessment with no tissue or soil analysis behind it.
- No yield, Brix or soil biology data accompanies any of the crop observations.
- Seasonal variation, other management changes and normal recovery are not ruled out for any of the reported improvements.
- This is the one summary in the Aug 2026 set supplied without its own limitations section, and its source material reads as promotional throughout. These caveats were written from what the source does and does not contain.
President Water Company · presidentwater.com · Delores Beyersdorf · Diversified Farm, Under two months from installation, as described on camera